Copyright disputes between CNKI and AI search in the context of internationalization

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

Internationalization has enabled academic exchanges to transcend national boundaries, greatly expanding the scope of knowledge dissemination. However, in this process, the protection of intellectual property rights has also faced new challenges. As an important domestic academic resource platform, HowNet has accumulated a large number of papers, titles and documents. When AI search technology emerges, its powerful search capabilities may touch the boundaries of intellectual copyright owned by HowNet.

From an international perspective, this not only involves domestic laws and regulations, but also international standards for the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights. Different countries have different laws and practices on intellectual property rights, which increases the complexity of dealing with such cross-border knowledge dissemination and copyright issues.

In international academic exchanges, the sharing and dissemination of papers is an important means to promote academic progress. However, how to maximize the dissemination of knowledge while protecting the rights and interests of authors and platforms is a difficult problem that needs to be balanced. On the one hand, HowNet's rights protection actions reflect its awareness of protecting its own rights and interests, but on the other hand, they may also have a certain impact on the openness of academic exchanges.

For the academic field, the trend of internationalization requires clearer and more unified intellectual property rules. This will not only help avoid similar copyright disputes, but also promote more effective use of academic resources around the world. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen international cooperation and coordination to jointly deal with new issues in knowledge dissemination and intellectual property protection.

For individual researchers, in an international academic environment, they need to have a clearer understanding of the relevant laws and regulations on intellectual property rights, respect the research results of others, and use academic resources reasonably. Otherwise, they may inadvertently infringe on the rights of others and bring themselves unnecessary trouble.

In short, the case of CNKI suing AI search has important implications in the context of internationalization. In the process of promoting the internationalization of academic exchanges, we need to continuously improve the intellectual property protection system to achieve a balance between knowledge sharing and rights protection.