the "xiaomei jury" in the takeaway industry: virtual justice and real dilemma

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

however, when we analyze the operation behind the "xiaomei jury" in depth, we can't help but wonder - can this mechanism really bring about change? can it truly reflect real social problems?

the controversy surrounding the movie "reverse life" is precisely the best reflection of this problem. in the movie, the deliveryman is given the halo of a "hero", but in the real world, he still faces various challenges. this phenomenon also reveals the mechanism and significance behind the "xiaomei jury".

the existence of the "xiaomei jury" has brought a "sense of justice" to society and provided a "virtual sense of security" for the plight of deliverymen. however, this "sense of justice" is illusory. it cannot solve the problem in reality and can only serve as a psychological placebo. this also reflects that the public's sympathy for deliverymen may be more like an escape from their own powerlessness rather than an actual social force.

among them, the "gamification" and "entertainment" mechanisms brought by the "xiaomei jury" may be a way for society to escape and a means of defense against reality. however, this kind of escape behavior will eventually have a negative impact on personal emotions. it may cause people to become "numb" and even ignore the real social problems, making it difficult to solve the dilemma.

we see that whether in film and television works or in various scenes in real life, they are all symbols of "sense of justice". however, this "sense of justice" often covers up real problems and eventually becomes a means of escape and compensation for negative emotions.